Inventing the AIDS Virus has 93 ratings and 12 reviews. Seth said: This amazing book makes a good case that HIV is NOT the cause of AIDS. Duesberg is not. So argues Dr. Peter Duesberg, one of the world’s leading microbiologists, a pioneer in the discovery of the HIV family of viruses, and a member of the National. Inventing the AIDS Virus By Peter H. Duesberg (review). Peter D. Friedmann. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Volume 40, Number 3, Spring , pp.
|Published (Last):||2 August 2007|
|PDF File Size:||19.34 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.7 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Eduardo rated it really liked it May 13, Dec 11, Brian rated it really liked it. Duesberg contends that there is a cabal of “microbe-hunters” who control research funding and are vested in the theory that HIV causes AIDS. After eight years of such exchanges, duesberh continues to object vehemently to the nearly unanimous conclusion in the microbiological community that H.
He hints ais vested interests and implies that diligent, intelligent scientists at every level have bought into an empty H. But with each passing decade, the potential complexity of so-called host-parasite relationships has become better appreciated.
Inventing the AIDS Virus – Wikipedia
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Duesberg’s last chapter sets forward what he thinks should be done in its full simplicity: In any case, the treatment for syphilis is penicillin, which is not toxic. A disproportionate number of footnotes refer to Mr. Duesberg’s evidence – revealed in top scientific journals but kept out of the mainstream press – raises questions the AIDS research establishment incenting so far declined to answer: Duesberg review Peter D.
The New York Review of Books published a long review. Reviewed by June E. AIDS denialist falsehoods from a crook who should be in jail. Duesberg blithely disregards the mountains of data contributing to the present understanding of microbial pathogenesis in general. Despite being published injust about everything it says is valid today. A chapter from the book.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases website. Book review hhe The New York Times.
Inventing the AIDS Virus
Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Most analysts believe that policy has resulted in dramatic reduction of the occurrence of post-transfusion hepatitis since it was instituted in the early ‘s. The book review from the San Francisco Chronicle. HIV denial in South Africa. Given his prominence as a professor of molecular and cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley, and his membership in the National Academy of Sciences, his arguments commanded attention.
Book titles OR Journal titles. Rebecca rated it it was amazing Dec 23, Horton concluded that Duesberg “fails to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the epidemiological method” and “recklessly deploys ill-thought-out epidemiological arguments to support his own drug-AIDS point of view”, but added that, “as a retrovirologist, Duesberg deserves to be heard, and the ideological assassination that he has undergone will remain an embarrassing testament to the reactionary tendencies of modern science” and that the need for new ideas meant that Duesberg’s research should be funded.
As for any role for viruses in causing cancer in humans, he rejects the mounting evidence as spurious.
Duesberg’s war on what he perceives to be a monolithic scientific establishment. View freely available titles: And a book review from the Washington Times.
Why have hundreds of thousands who have had HIV – for many years – remained perfectly healthy? Another book review from The Record. Rabbitoh rated it it was ok Jun 27, His blithe dismissal of epidemiological evidence as “circumstantial ” raises serious questions about the rigor of Ads. He is at least consistent in his iconoclasm, for he disbelieves many things.
A book review from the Boston Herald. In recent years, many chronic viral infections such as recurrent herpes simplex or the reactivation of the latent chicken pox virus to cause shingles have been studied in depth, and investigation of the role played by viruses is considered by most researchers to offer a particularly rich source of insight into the cause of other chronic diseases and even of cancer.
Adam Ross rated it it was amazing Feb 14, Before the development of heat-treated plasma inand before blood donor screening became possible inmany hemophiliacs were given clotting factor contaminated with the virus and became infected with H.
Duesberg dismisses the issue: Regnery Publishing, Pp. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
She concluded that while AIDS research has a “chequered history and “some of the questions raised by Duesberg and his followers were valid”, Duesberg and Hodgkinson’s arguments were “circular” and “ignore diverse and robust evidence linking HIV with AIDS”. May 13, Xids Stephens rated it did not like it. Crowe acknowledged that the book was controversial, but credited Duesberg with showing that “medical science has often before looked for an infectious cause to diseases that were actually caused by dietary deficiencies or even induced by drugs.
Refresh and try again. The foreword by Kary Mullis. Book review by six Professors. Aug 05, John is currently reading it. For the thousands who are suffering from AIDS or trying to cope with the escalating demands of treating this deadly illness, Mr. Dec 17, Seth rated it it was amazing.